06 Feb 2010




(Joseph’s Blessing, Judah’s Shame)

“O’ evei, We are thine! Thou never bearest rule over them. They were never called by thy name.”

O’ Happy day! O’ Happy Day! When evei

Takes those Jews away!

The very first thing that Joshua did upon entering the promised land, was to separate the Sons of Judah from all of the other tribes of Israel. He commanded the sons of Judah to remain within their border in the South. All of the other tribes were to remain within the border on the North. (Josh 18:5)

“What evei joins, let no man put asunder.” Conversely, “What evei separates, let no man rejoin!”

Almost without exception, the descent of rule in a kingdom is by direct bloodline and the exclusive birthright of the firstborn male. Yahushua (Messiah), is the Firstborn Son of our Heavenly Father. His kingdom was not of this world. In the Law, the firstborn male of every living creature is commanded to be dedicated to our Heavenly Father.

For Yahushua to rightfully obtain an earthly kingship through the Birthright of a firstborn Son, He must be of direct bloodline descent of an earthly father who holds that Birthright! Thus, fulfilling the Commandment!

That earthly Birthright of the firstborn descended to the Sons of Joseph, not the sons of Judah! The Son’s of Judah rule, but not by the Birthright of a firstborn son. Rather, like their father before them, by lies and deception!

Jesus, the Jew, is a Talmudic Zionist Impostor planted by Identity Theft.

The name “Jesus” replaced the name: “Yahushua.” Satan has indeed transformed himself into an Angel of light and his ministers into ministers of the gospel, (The Talmudic Zionist Judeo-Christian Churches). Virtually the entire world has been deceived! These Talmudic Zionist have seized power and now rule the world! How do you like the “Change?” It is these Zionist Sons of Judah, who are without the Birthright of the Firstborn Son.

It is “Yahushua” alone, who is both a firstborn Son of YHWH and a firstborn Son of Joseph, through Ephraim. He alone holds both the Earthly & Heavenly Birthright of the Firstborn. “Thy will be done on Earth, as it is in Heaven.” Let “the Bride maketh herself ready!”Cast out the impostors and Yahushua will rule in Heaven and Earth as King of Kings and Lord of Lords!

“Come out of her my people.” for I know them that say they are Jews but are not!

The power of the Zionist Jews will not be broken until their group validity and respectability has been destroyed and or seriously damaged. As long as the blind sheep believe the false propaganda that “Messiah / Christ is a Jew”, we will never recover from the lie of the serpent people. This line of thinking is only justified by alleging that Messiah / Christ came through Judah, now supported by most of the baal box preacher’s of churchianity. The false Zionist Jews will continue to reign on this planet. The consequences of those who support the Judah progenitor theory are forever propping up modern Talmudic Jewry by giving it support and respectability. They might as well run down the street proclaiming, Yahushua / Jesus is a Jew. Furthermore they really have not “COME OUT OF HER.” Yet many so called Identity Christians refuse to open up their minds and change their views in the face overwhelming evidence. “In the latter days, knowledge will increase”. Dan 12:4. We believe that an exegesis of the Bible, together with historical accounts and just common observation, show that Joseph, not Judah, is the progenitor of Yahshuha. Judah was the poster child for a life of evil, sin and racial transgression. The Bible shows not one incident where Judah did the right thing to produce a righteous bloodline.

Judah did not marry Tamar — he fornicated with her, his daughter-in-Law, and conceived Zarah and Pharez by her out of wedlock. He uncovered his son’s nakedness. For this act the Law requires both the male and female be put to death! Judah was all for putting Tamar to death for becoming with child by whoredom, until he discovered he was the father. He then repented of his zeal to put Tamar to death, and spared her and himself. Phineas would have killed Judah.



Esau sold his Birthright for a morsel of bread and soup. Judah

Pledged his Signet, Bracelets, and Staff for the services of a Harlot.

Esau never regained his Birthright! Judah never redeemed his pledge!

2368 6616 4294

Judah pledged his: Signet, Bracelets & Staff to Tamar.

*Pledge: nvbro (AR-aw-bone) *6162 from 6148 *(Mortgage / surety)

Signet: mxh (kho-thawm) *2368 from 2856 (one’s Sovereign Mark)

Bracelet: lixp (paw-theel) *6616 from 6617 (a binding token)

Staff: etm ( met-teh’) *4294 from 5186 (Patriarch or Ruler of Tribe)


Do not confuse a “natural Birthright,” with the “The Birthright of the Firstborn.” In the world every child inherits the name of their father by natural birthright, regardless of birth order. Judah was the “fourth-born” son. Therefore Judah’s claim to be a son of Jacob / Israel is by natural birthright.

Judah’s claim to the Patriarchal status is based upon his natural birthright as a son of Jacob and his natural Birthright to be the head of his Tribe. NOT by the “Birthright of a Firstborn!”

The Birthright of the Firstborn (by the Laws of YHWH) clearly went to Ephraim, the Son of Joseph! By Law, only the Firstborn male is “Consecrated to YHWH.” Only one holding the Birthright of the Firstborn can convey that right to his Firstborn son.

Tamar did NOT restore Judah’s pledge, & Judah did NOT redeem it!

When Tamar the harlot could not be found, Judah said:

3947 (el – hqx)

Gen 38:23 “Let her *take it to her, lest we be shamed.”

· (“Let her ‘keep it for herself’ lest we be shamed.”

6162 – 6148

Three months later, Gen 38:24, Tamar still had Judah’s pledge when she was discovered with child by whoredom!

Let’s apply the same standard to Judah as was applied to Esau. In the light of what Judah said in Gen 38:23, indicates whatever is signified by Judah’s “Signet,” “Bracelets,” and “Staff” was transferred (forfeited) to “TAMAR!

Judah said: “Let her keep them lest we be shamed!” He clearly had no intention of redeeming his pledge!

Judah forfeited his claim to: everything his SignetBracelets and Staff signify, by not redeeming his pledge. Thus, they were traded for the favors of a Harlot!

“The workman is worthy of his hire.” This applies equally to theworking woman.

Everything Judah pledged then, now belongs to Tamar, as a matter of Right and as a matter of Law. This was no different than not redeeming an article at a Pawn Shop. By Law one’s Covenant, Pledge, or Oath must be kept. Once made, they are not optional and their breach has consequences.

Bottom line:

Tamar is now the Chief / Ruler / Matriarch of the sons of Judah!

Questions we need to answer:

1) Who was Tamar? A daughter of Ishmael, Canaan or Shem? This is a major point because Tamar is the Matriarch of Judah!

2) By her deeds, can we know what Tamar was? (especially her character)

3) Is this why Judah’s sons claim descent through their mother?

4) Is this why the Sons of Judah have acquired and maintained a virtual monopoly on the possession and interpretation of ancient sacred writings?

5) Is this why it has taken years for even small portions of the Dead Sea Scrolls to be published by the alleged “Experts?”

6) Is that virtual monopoly an attempt to steal the Birthright of the Firstborn from Joseph’s son Ephraim?

7) Do the Talmudic Zionist sons of Judah rule over the Judeo-Christian churches, in the very same manner Zionist rule over all of our political institutions? Are we in denial of the plain facts, or can’t we believe our lying eyes?

In contradistinction Joseph’s life was a life of near perfection coupled with being a Birthright First Born Prophet, Seer, and a Revelator through his dreams. Which one more resembled Yahushua Christ? Which one would you choose? We are told to, “Come out of Her”, meaning Judeo-Christianity. Some people simply will not accept new Truths regardless of how logical they are.

Jacob’s Family

Jacob had twelve sons by four women, Leah, Bilpah, Zilpah, and Rachael. Bilpah and Zilpah were the Handmaids of Jacob’s wives, (Leah & Rachel). Jacob & Rachel also had two grand-sons that were adopted as direct sons of Jacob. Ephraim and Manasseh. Gen 48:1-5

Judah was the fourth born son of Jacob and Leah. Joseph was the eleventh son of Jacob, but the Firstborn son of Jacob and Rachael. Rachael was the wife chosen by YHWH that Jacob had waited for. She was his choice. The wives were not equal in Jacob’s perception. Rachel was Jacob’s intended wife, but Jacob was deceived by his father-in-law and first given Leah.

Reuben, Simeon, Levi, and Judah, were all the end product of this deception.

Joseph was the only son who received a Coat of Many Colors, Gen 37:3. Joseph dreamed dreams and told his brethren. They hated him more. Joseph’s brethren hated him because they all knew that Joseph was Jacob’s favorite, Gen 37:4-5.

Joseph dreamed that the sun and the moon and the eleven stars would make obeisance to him. Gen 37:9. Even Jacob doubted Joseph at that point, especially about the obeisance and bowing down, Gen 37:10. The same word Strong’s 7812 is used to describe both ”obeisance” in verse 9 and “bow down” in verse 10. These dreams ultimately came to pass.

Joseph’s statement about the dream was so notable that Jacob remembered it, Gen 37:11. Joseph’s brethren conspired to slay Joseph because of Joseph’s dreams, Gen 37:18. What an evil thing to do! It was Reuben, the oldest, who refused to be part of any murder, Gen 37:22.

It was Judah who then suggested that Joseph be sold, Gen 37:27. Ultimately the sons sold Joseph to the Midianites for 20 pieces of silver.Judah had the commercial entrepreneurial spirit even then. Yahushua was sold for 30 pieces of silver.

Are there not many similarities between Joseph and Yahushua / Messiah at this point? Joseph’s brothers continued with their deceit by bringing the Coat of Many Colors back to Jacob and telling Jacob how Joseph allegedly died. “Oh what tangled webs we weave when we practice to deceive.”, Sir Walter Scott. Joseph ultimately ended up as the chief operating officer, second only to the Pharaoh in Egypt.


Gen 38:1 it says that Judah “went down” from his brethren. The word used is Strong’s #3381. It means: “to go down, descend, decline, march down, sink down”. When Judah left his brethren he was not separate as commanded and was in fact a close associate of the most evil people in the world, the Canaanites. Who would you expect to be in living the land of Canaan? Canaanites of course. We can only speculate as to why Judah left but it was a knowing violation of the law.

Judah married and impregnated Bedsu-El, the daughter of Shuah, the Canaanite. Gen 38:2. It was a clear violation of the law for Judah to marry or even be in association with any Canaanite let alone mix the holy seed. Judah not only mixed his holy seed with the most evil group of people on the face of the earth. Judah was not only a race mixer but a race traitor. This was nothing less than genocide or high treason and Judah should have been killed Phineas style for this transgression.

Bebsu-El bore Judah a son named Er, a Canaanite, Gen 38:3. Bedsu-El bore Judah a son named Onan, a Canaanite, Gen 38:4. Bedsu-El bore Judah a son named Shelah, a Canaanite, Gen 38:5.

Judah obtained a wife for Er his Canaanite son. Her name was Tamar, Gen 38:6. Why would Judah go to the daughters of Shem (as found in “Jewish interpreted Apocrypha), to get a pure-blood wife for his half Canaanite son? Any offspring of such union would still be an adulterated bloodline. If Tamar were a Shemite, why would she consent to marry a Canaanite? We hold the aforementioned Jewish interpretation in great suspect, as by the Law, it is without a required second witness.

There is no question that Tamar was NOT an Israelite. From the Jewish version of the book of Jasher, Tamar appears to be a daughter of Shem. It would have been impossible for her to have been an Israelite. In fact none of the wives of any of the 12 sons of Jacob could have been Israelites, unless they married one of their possible sisters. Tamar would have been too young and it would have been a violation of the law for Judah to have married Tamar if she were say Reuben’s niece.

We do not know exactly who Tamar was but we know whom she was not. Tamar was living in the land of Canaan. If she were a daughter of Shem she also was not obeying the law to be separate. Who else lived in the Land of Canaan other than Canaanites and self-exiled Judah? It is most probable that she was consequently in fact a Canaanite and that may have been the reason why she had no problem marrying Judah’s Canaanite son Er, then marrying his Canaanite son Onan, and would have married Shelah if Judah had made it possible. It might also explain why she had no problem playing a Harlot! See Gen 38:14. Judah had married Bedsu-El, the daughter of Shua the Canaanite. So for Judah to fornicate with a Canaanite woman would not be out of character.

The connections between Judah and the Canaanites are overwhelming! For an Israelite just being in the land of Canaan would have been a violation of the law, namely not to be separate. Can anyone imagine Yahshuha being born of an incident that was clearly a violation of the law? Yahweh is perfect. There was never any desire for perfection with Judah.

Er, the first Canaanite son of Judah, was so wicked that Yahweh had him slain. Gen 38:7. Onan, the second Canaanite son, was so evil that Yahweh had him slain, Gen 38:10. There are few other recorded incidents in the bible where people were so evil that they were intentionally killed by Yahweh.

Judah wanted Tamar to marry his third Canaanite son, Shelah. Tamar apparently agreed and dwelt in her father’s house, Gen 38:11. Tamar apparently had no problem with marrying Shelah, the Canaanite.

Tamar was in fact a prostitute and had the characteristics of one. Judah was a knowing whore monger. This union was a clear violation of the law for several reasons. Judah and Tamar both committed incest by having carnal relations with each other. Tamar was Judah’s daughter-in-law, having been married to Judah’s sons, Er and Onan. Judah was involved with Er’s and Onan’s widow. While with the required second witnessto this event Judah could claim innocence about being involved with Tamar, she certainly could not. This was incest pure and simple, not just once but twice, by both Judah and Tamar. Judah ultimately impregnated Tamar under fraud (we are told), Gen 38:18 but ALSO by whoredom Gen 38:24. Tamar delivered twins Pharez and Zerah, Gen 38:29-30. Their mother was a whore and their father was a whore monger, having had intimate relations with a Canaanite, both of their parents were guilty of incest. Pharez and Zerah were the products of whoredom!

If Tamar were a Canaanite then Pharez and Zerah would have been Canaanites and consequently Judah had no unadulterated Israelite seed.

When Reuben transgressed and defiled his father’s bed, he lost the Birthright of the firstborn! Apply that same principle to Judah, who not only adulterated his bloodline, but then defiled the bed of his son! Actions have consequences.

The name of “Judah” in Greek is called “JUDAS” in the Septuagint translation, and it is “Ioudas”….”Judas” ….

Judas was a traitor to his people by race mixing with Canaanites and trying to sell Joseph etc. He was a traitor to his family, he was a traitor to his son, traitor to the House of Israel and a traitor to himself.

Judas is the poster boy for evil.

We revere prophets and scorn evil doers. I can think of no instance where Judah’s conduct, or that of his sons was laudatory. They continually embraced evil in all of its available forms. Yet people still cling to the false teaching that Judah was some how pure and righteous enough to be the progenitor of Yahushua. Simply said, Judah (Judas in Greek) was the poster boy for un-repented evil and wrong doing.


After the coming out of Egypt, if the sons of Judah were of the same pure blood Israelites, (Jos 18:5), Joshua would not have first separated the sons of Judah from all of the other tribes of Israel and commanded them to remain within their borders in the South. Joshua would not have commanded all of the other tribes of Israel to remain within their border on the North! Joshua followed the law to be separate. This is as a second witness that House of Judah which included Judah’s descendants, were in fact so different that they had to be separated from the House of Israel as commanded by the law.

Jacob and his wife, together with all of his sons bowed down to Joseph, Gen 44:14. This was a fulfillment of Joseph’s dreams and prophecy. At this time for sure there can be no allegation that Judah had the scepter. Judah was in fact in fear for his life and not in control of anyone.

When we examine Joseph’s life we find an essentially sinless man. He was not married to Canaanites nor involved with whores nor deception. Joseph did not ever want to kill any of his brothers nor sell his brother into slavery, or other serious violations of the law. Joseph never sold nor tried to sell any of his brothers. Joseph did not leave his family and to our knowledge never went into the Land of Canaan.

Joseph was able to interpret dreams. Gen 40:12. The dreams became true and showed the mark of a true prophet.

Jacob’s Blessings

Gen 49:1 And Jacob called unto his sons and said,: “Gather yourselves together, that I may tell you that which shall befall you in the last days.” LAST DAYS. This chapter refers to the Last days and not to the time of Jacob’s proclamation. Once this primal concept has been understood, then this verse takes on a whole new meaning.

Reviewing Chapter 49 as a whole, Joseph was the only one to receive blessings and some of the other 11 received what could easily be called a curse! (just a statement of their characters). Note that of all the twelve sons the word “bless” (Gen 49:25) ONLY applied to Joseph. Judah was NOT blessed in verses 9-10.

The Scepter

The most famous verse is Gen 49:10 where it says that the scepter shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet until Shiloh comes. This is not an unlimited delegation of power. The only way that Judah could keep the scepter forever would be if Shiloh would never come. This would be blasphemy.

The position that Judah would have the scepter forever was developed by Comparet and accepted by Capt, Lent and Wickstrom. The second part of verse 10 was conveniently ignored to accommodate previous prejudices.

When Shlhoh comes the scepter will be taken away from Judah-jewry. When reviewed with verse 1, the last days, it means that Zionist Judah-Jews will have the scepter, meaning worldwide control, until Shiloh – Yahushua comes. This makes sense in view of history and current events. Judah obviously did not have the scepter when he bowed down to Joseph millennia ago but today Zionist Judah-Jews are ruling the world.

Some believe that at the time of Christ that Rome meaning Caesar and the Romans had the scepter. Well if Caesar and the Romans had the scepter, they must have been Judah and not Gad. The simple fact of the matter is that Pilate was “the more afraid” of the jews. As a side point according to the Judah advocates, Judah would then be Germany, Ireland and Italy, the Three Tribes of Judah.

Jhn 19:8 When

3753 Pilate 4091 therefore 3767 heard 191 that 5126 saying 3056, he was 5399 0 themore 3123 afraid 5399 ;

I am sure that the ADL would be happy to hear that the Romans had the scepter and that they killed Christ. Christ was crucified because Pilate was afraid of the jews, who had the scepter, meaning real and not theoretical power.

The destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD is posited to show that the Romans had the scepter and how they had destroyed the jews, at least those who lived in Jerusalem. The Romans may have destroyed Jerusalem and all of its inhabitants but they did not destroy jewry who still had a base in Khazaria.

Ironically 2000 years later the jews still have the scepter and Rome is just history.


There is no question that Joseph was given the birthright of the firstborn. The word birthright occurs 10 times in the KJV. Birthright is typically translated from Strong’s 1062 and once as 4415. While there is no clear definition for the birthright we can go to Strong’s 4415 for an indication as, “the right or advantages of the first born son” which is Primogeniture for short. Although Joseph was the 11th born son of Jacob, he was thefirstborn son of Jacob and Rachel. Yahweh intervened in this birthright order because of Reuben defiling his father’s bed. Judah was a forth-born son and a product of deception. We need to remember that the birthright was a very important gift, Gen 27:36. In fact Judah-Jewry (Esau) would still like to regain the birthright from Joseph and that partially explains the wars and racial mixing so detrimental to the House of Israel today.

Joseph is the only one that received anything like a blessing. THIS is the reason that all the other sons, INCLUDING Judah, were so jealous of Joseph. This was the reason for YHVH separating Joseph from the rest of the sons of Jacob/Israel. YHVH had bigger and better plans for Joseph. His mother, Rachel, was the FIRST intended bride for Jacob (Gen 29:1-30). Rachel was the FIRST woman he laid eyes on, at the well, and Jacob was told that the woman he met at the well, was to be his bride ….but LABAN, Rachel’s and Leah’s father, who was also Jacob’s uncle, his mother’s brother, tricked via deception Jacob into marrying Leah first, because she was the oldest of the two women, and the younger daughter wasn’t to be married UNTIL the oldest daughter was married….and Laban, pretending it was Rachel that Jacob was going to marry.

1 Chr. 5: 1-2 and the Birthright

We have reviewed the Paleo Hebrew for 1 Chr. 5: 1-2 for context. The result is a much clearer understanding of what is being said. I believe that the following translation is the most accurate available especially in light of modern science, i.e. DNA.

1 Chr. 5:1 — “Now the sons of Reuben firstborn of Israel, for he was firstborn. But, because he defiled his father’s bed, the birthright (right of the firstborn) was given to the sons of Joseph, the son of Israel. And the birthright is no longer to be reckoned after the genealogy.”

1 Chr. 5:2 — “And Judah prevailed to rule over his brother’s (right of the firstborn), but the birthright is Joseph’s.”

The KJV corrupts this text to read: “The genealogy is not to be reckoned after the birthright.” This is absolutely reversed! We do not get our genealogy from our birthright. It should be translated as: “The Birthright (concerning Reuben) is no longer to be reckoned after the genealogy”. Our genealogy comes from our parents. In fact in Italian, Il genitori, means the parents. The root word comes from Greek, “genea”…i.e. ”breed”, ”kind”

The physical demonstrates the spiritual. If it were not that way the whole universe would be chaotic. Modern science with its DNA rules is just a subset of Yahweh’s laws. Birthright along with any other genetic characteristic is passed from parent to child. This would tend to show that Esau was a Canaanite because he was warring with Jacob in Rebecca’s womb. Esau went back to his roots and married two Canaanites. Judah also had an attraction for Canaanites. He went down into the Land of Canaan. He married one and had three Canaanite children. He was concerned for Shela, his Canaanite son. It would be chaotic to give Joseph the birthright and then make Judah the genetic ancestor of Yahushua. A double minded man is unstable in all of his ways.

Concept of the First Born

Almost without exception, descent of rule in kingdoms is by birthright, which is the right of the firstborn male. Thus, Yahushua descendant of Joseph through Ephraim is the true Messiah, birthright King of Israel. Judeo Christians believe that “Jesus,” a Zionist fabricated fiction, is the Messiah, king of the Jews. But “Jesus” of the Jews, is without the required birthright of the firstborn son. Judah, a fourth-born son, never received the birthright and therefore cannot convey to his sons that which was never his. Being without a birthright, “Jesus” is exposed as an impostor and a pure fabrication and Zionist deception.

Note that Joseph was the first born of Jacob and Rachael, the chosen wife of Jacob, just as Yahushua was the first born son of Joseph and Mary. Note that Joseph was the name of Yahushua’s father. Judah was the fourth-born of Leah, and a product of deception!

The birthright includes the bloodline descent of the Monarch’s kingdom through his firstborn. No where in the bible is Judah ever named as either the first born or having been given rights as the first born. If Judah did not have the birthright of the Firstborn, he can not pass it on to his children.

Joseph is the only son who is given the Birthright of a firstborn, by his father Jacob, because of Rueben’s vile transgression. Judah cannot convey a right he never had.

Jer 31: 9 “ . . . for I am a father to Israel, and Ephraim is my firstborn.”

When Joseph was given the Birthright of the firstborn, he was not only given the property rights but the promise that the Messiah would descend through him! This conclusion makes sense from both a character analysis of both Judah and Joseph but from an analysis of bible prophecy, the Law, and observation of current events.


Lets look at Joseph’s blessings Gen 49:22-26. “From there is the Shepherd, the Stone (Prophet) of Israel.” verse 24. He received many blessings of not only heaven above but of the deep AND OF THE WOMB, Verse 25. This is not just a double portion of property. Verse 26 including the Strong’s numbers states as follows —

Gen 49:26 The blessings

1293 of thy father 1 have prevailed 1396 above the blessings 1293 of my progenitors2029 unto the utmost bound 8379 of the everlasting 5769 hills 1389: they shall be on the head 7218 of Joseph 3130, and on the crown of the head 6936 of him that was separate 5139 from his brethren 251.

Probably the word “separate” in verse 26 says it all. This means consecrated or devoted one. Note the limitless language of this verse. No qualifiers or limitations as with Judah’s blessing in verse 10. Not only was he separate but he had the “crown” of the blessings.

I realize that the genealogies show Judah as being the progenitor of Yahushua. We can never forget who did the translating and what their interests were. Chronicles chapters 1-5. Matt 1, Luke 3:23-38. However, David the King was a Moabite! Ruth 1:4 & 4:17

To know the truth concerning King David of the Jews, we must go back to the first assumption concerning his roots as set forth in the Book of Ruth. Here, we find he was a descendant of Pharez, son of Judah and Tamar.

Let us do the accounting with attention to detail.

Ruth 1:1

“And it was in the days Judges *Judged (*Israel) and was a famine in the land (of Judah) and sojourned a man from Bet Lacham-Judah, to dwell in the land (country) of Moab, he his wife and his two sons.”


1) No Judges ruled in Judah, ever! So while Judges ruled in Israel (The Northern House), these events took place in Judah (The Southern House).

2) Joshua had separated Judah from the other Tribes of Israel and commanded they each remain within their borders. Jos 18:5

3) Judges ruled in Israel until King Saul was made King.

4) Ruth the Moabitess was the Grandmother of King David. Ruth 4:22

5) These events took place in Judah, before Saul was made King of Israel. Ruth 1:1

6) During this time Judah and Israel were two completely separate houses.

7) During this time Judah and Israel were in occasional conflict with each other.

8) The events in the book of Ruth, Chronologically, occurred in Judah before the events of 1 Samuel, and, at a time when each of the tribes were within their own inheritance.

Ruth 1:2 410 4432

“And the name of the man was Eli-melech (my god- is Molech) and the name of his wife was Naomi, and the name of his two sons were Mahlon ( 4248 – sick) and Chilion (3630- destruction), *Ephrathites (*672 – fruits) of Bet *Lacham-Judah. (*3898a Lacham).

* #672 “fruits” as meant in “fruit of the womb,” works, offspring, or children. This Hebrew meaning is also demonstrated in: “Be fruitfuland multiply.” (Gen 1:28)

Note: 1035 0 ¬ read

1) Strong’s deliberately mis-numbers: Bet Lacham, mhl – xib-m with Strong’s # 1035 placed over the word Lacham (above) and the

# “0” over the word: “bet” (house).

“Lacham,” (mhl) is Strong’s #3898a. AAnd “bet” (xib) is # 1004.

By this deliberate mis-numbering and use of the erroneous Strong’s # 1035, two Hebrew words become combined into one word, which is then falsely interpreted: “Bethlehem! If you will but take the time to understand this, you will understand the meaning of “The lying pen of the Scribe worketh deceit.” And, “ The sin of Judah is written with a pen of iron.”

There was no Bethlehem in Judah! It is a corruption of “Bet-Lacham” (house of Warriors, in Judah), a former Garrison of the Philistines! It is only a LIE used to supplant the Beth-lehem in Zebulon in Northern Galilee, and promote the false claim that Yahushua was a Jew!

Ruth 1:3

“And Elimelech, Naoi’s husband died and she was left with her two sons.

Ruth 1:4

And they took to themselves wives of the women of Moab; the name of the one was Orpah ( Strong’s #6203 – stiffnecked), and the name of the other, Ruth (Strong’s # 7327 - friend), And they dwelled there about ten years.”

Ruth 1:5

“And Mahlon and Chilion both died and the woman (Naomi) was left without her two sons and her husband.”

Ruth 1:6

“Then she arose with her daughters-in-Law, that she might return from the country of Moab.”

Ruth 1:7

“Wherefore she went forth with her two daughters in Law and they proceeded on the way to return to the land of Judah.”

Ruth 1:8

“And Naomi said to each of her daughters in Law, go return to the house of your mother. . . . . .”

Ruth 1:10

“And they said unto her, Surely we will return with thee unto thy people”

Ruth 1:15

“And she (Naomi) said: (to Ruth):

“Behold thy sister-in-law has gone back unto her people and unto her gods. Return thou after thy sister-in–law.”

Ruth 2:1

“And Naomi had a kinsman of her husband’s, a mighty man of wealth of the family of Elimelech; and his name was Boaz.(Strong’s 1162 – fleetness)

Ruth 2:5

Then said Boaz to his servant that was set over the reapers, Who’s damsel is this?”

Ruth 2:6

“And the servant that was set over the reapers answered saying: It is the *Moabite (*Strong’s #4125 – Moabitedamsel that came back with Naomi, out of the country of Moab.”

Ruth 2:10

“Then she (Ruth) fell on her face and bowed herself to the ground, and said unto him (Boaz), “Why have I found grace in thine eyes, that thou should take knowledge of me, seeing I am a* STRANGER?”

(Strong’s # 5237 – *foreigner)

Ruth 2:11

“And Boaz answered her, it hath fully been shown me, all that thou hast done unto thy mother-in-law since the death of thy husband and how thou has left thy father and mother, and the land of thy nativity, and have come unto a people which thou knewest not *heretofore.

( *Strong’s # 8543 – previously or before)

Question: Ruth knew she was a foreigner, could she have forgotten she was an Israelite?

Ruth 4:5

Then said Boaz, What day thou buyest the field of the hand of Naomi, thou must buy it also of Ruth the Moabite, the wife of the dead, to raise up the name of the dead upon his inheritance.

Ruth 4:6

“And the kinsman said, I cannot redeem it for myself, lest I *mar (Strong’s 7843 – destroy or corruptmine own inheritance.”

NOTE: If Ruth were an Israelite, this act of a kinsman Redeemer would secured his inheritance, not alienated or destroyed it!

Ruth 4:11

“And all the *people that were in the gate, and the **elders said: We are witness. YHWH make the woman that is come into thine house like Rachel and like Leah, which two did build the house of Israel. and do thou worthily in *ephratah.

( *Strong’s # 672 fruitfulness), and be famous in *Bethlehem (Strong’s 3898a – Beit-Lacham), And let thy house be like the house of Pharez whom Tamar bear unto Judah, of the seed of which YHWH shall give thee of this young woman.”


1) Ruth was a Stranger / Moabite / foreigner, thus if “like the house of Pharez,” then Tamar was also a Stranger, of Canaanite or other foreign blood to Israel. Judah should have gone to the sons of Laban, (Rachel’s kin), or to the sons of Shem. Instead, Judah chose BedsuEl a Canaanite! When BedsuEl died, Judah then fornicated with Tamar, (his daughter-in-law), which was a “Breach” of the Covenant (Law)! As implied in the name: “Pharez” (breach).

2) Pharez (Strong’s 6557 – ‘breach’), was a son of whoredom, deceit, and breach of the Covenant!

Ruth 4:13

“So Boaz took Ruth and she was his wife, and when he went in unto her, YHWH gave her conception and she bear a son.”

Ruth 4:16

“And Naomi took the child and ‘* laid it in her bosom,’ and became nurse unto it.” * unofficial adoption?

Ruth 4:17

And the women her neighbors gave it a name saying, There is a son born to Naomi and they called his name *Obed (Strong’s # 5744 – *serving), he is the father of *Jesse (Strong’s 3448 – *I possess), the father of David.”

NOTE: Obed was NOT born to Naomi, but only counted as born of Naomi. This adoption does not correct the adulterated Moabite blood!

Ruth 4:18

“Now these are the generations of Pharez. (son of Tamar). Pharez begat Hezron.

4:19 And Hezron begat Ram, and Ram begat Amminadab.

4:20 “And Amminadab begat Nahshon, and Nahshon begat Salmon.

4:21 “And Salmon begat Boaz, and Boaz begat Obed.

4:22 “And Obed begat Jesse, and Jesse begat David.”

Conclusion: Now we know why Jer 8: 1-3 calls them a Dung

1Sa 16:1 And the LORD said unto Samuel, How long wilt thou mourn for Saul, seeing I have rejected him from reigning over Israel? fill thine horn with oil, and go, I will send thee to Jesse the Bethlehemite: for I have provided me a king among his sons.

This below, taken from the actual Paleo text is the root of our diverse understandings.

1 Sam 12:15 Although evei permitted Israel to have a King, King Saul’s kingship over Israel and their self-rule is made conditional. “But if you will not obey – - – -.”

I Sam 15:28 The Prophet Samuel told King Saul: “evei has rent the kingdom of Israel from thee this day and given it to a neighbor of thine that is better than thou.”

Who was Israel’s neighbor? Judah!

1 Sam 16:1

3902 1004 3902

Bet-ha-Lachmi imhle – xib (House of the Warriors)

This text above is found in 1 Sam 16:1 and 1:Sam 16:18, it is corrupted to read in the KJV: “Bethlehem.” Then, Strong’s erroneously mis-numbers these words with the numbers for “Bethlehem.” The numbers above, are the correct Strong’s numbers.

This shows conclusively that Samuel, (the Northern House of Israel’s Prophet) went to the “House of Warriors” (a garrison in Judah) to anoint David the Moabite Warrior, King over Israel! After the Kingdom of Israel was taken away from King Saul. 1 Sam 15:28 (infra).

1035 1004 1035

Bet-lechem mhl – xib (House of Bread) text found in Gen 35:19

*Near where Rachel was buried in Zebulon. (Northern Galilee)

The above in Gen 35:19, is the correct text words for “Bethlehem,” with the correct Strong’s Numbers.

This discovery is significant.

King David of Judah WAS a Moabite!

He is not the David (a lad) of Ephraim, who killed Goliath, and became King Saul’s Weapon Bearer!

What would David, a son of Ephraim, a mere lad, Weapon Bearer of King Saul, of the Northern Kingdom of Israel, be doing in the House of Warriors, a Garrison in the Southern Kingdom of Judah?

Why would Samuel the Prophet journey all the way to Judah to anoint Saul’s weapon bearer? And how would the King and the Kingdom (self-rule) have been taken away from the Northern House of Israel, If Saul’s Weapon Bearer, were made King? What we have here is a biblical case of “Identity Theft” and an attempt to seize the birthright of Joseph !” This is that spoken of in Gen 49:10 by Jacob, when he told his sons what will befall them in the last days: Judah will hold rule over Israel until Shiloh comes. . . as it is this day!

1Sa 16:18 Then answered one of the servants, and said, Behold, I have seen a son of Jesse the Bethlehemite, [that is] cunning in playing, and a mighty valiant man, and a man of war, and prudent in matters, and a comely person, and the LORD [is] with him.

NOTE: Here again Bet-ha Lachmi is corrupted to “Bethlehem.”

And this David is not the Weapon Bearer of King Saul o Israel, but a mighty Moabite Warrior of Judah!

The Galilean Connection

Yahshuha had a strong connection to Galilee and the House of Israel. Considering the overall biblical importance of race and family it only natural that he came to his own.

“He came unto his own and his own received him not.”

John 1:11

What does this mean? It means that he came to the House of Israel, Northern Kingdom, and the House of Israel did not accept him. He did not go to the Jews, he did not go to Judah, they were not his own, it is that simple

He said that he come only to and went to the lost sheep of the House of Israel and by express inference not to the House of Judah. Matt 10:6 and Matt 15.:24. He built his church upon Peter who also was a Galilean, See Matt 26:73 and Mark 14:70. Historically there had been severe wars between the House of Israel and the House of Judah. Racially they were different and with different speech, they were separated. It was the Romans who in Yahushua’s time that forced them into a confederation under Roman rule.

Before Yahushua was even two years old, Herod issued a decree that all male children under two years old be killed. It was only the children in the Bethlehem-Galilee area who were affected. Rachel wept (v. 18) for her children. Her children were of the House of Israel and none other. Judah, was the son of Leah! Herod did not seek to kill the children of Bethlehem-Judah. Herod knew from what tribe the Messiah would come, and it wasn’t the tribe of Judah! See Matt 2:12-18.

Yahushua (the Messiah) descended from Joseph and his connections to the 10 tribe Northern Kingdom, not Judah, are strong and overwhelming. The following examples show his connections.

Yahushua was from Nazareth, which is part of the Northern House of Israel, which for a time, was also called: the House of Joseph, and the Northern Kingdom. He came and dwelt in a city called Nazareth that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophets, He shall be called a Nazarene. See Matt 23:23. The multitude said, This is Yahushua, the prophet of Nazareth of Galilee Matt 21:11. And when he was gone out into the porch, another [maid] saw him, and said unto them that were there, This [fellow] was also with Yahushua of Nazareth. Matt 26:71

Yahushua was baptised in Galilee And it came to pass in those days, that Yahushua came from Nazareth of Galilee, and was baptized of John in Jordan. Matt 3:13 and Mark 1:9

Even the satanic spirits knew that Yahushua was from Galilee –

Saying, Let [us] alone; what have we to do with thee, thou Yahushua of Nazareth? Art thou come to destroy us? I know thee who thou art, the Holy One of God. Mark 1:24. Also a man with an unclean spirit knew that Yahushua was from Nazareth Luke 4:33-34

Bartimaeus knew that Yahushua came from Galilee Mark 10:46-47.

Luke gives us the best examples. The angel Gabriel was sent unto Nazareth of Galilee. Luke 1:26. Yahushua’s own city was Nazareth. Luke 2:39

Yahushua returned with his parents to Nazareth and was subject to his parents. Luke 2:51. Luke 4:16 Yahushua had been brought up in Nazareth.

The multitude knew that Yahushua was from Galilee Luke 18:36-37

The prophets, did write, Yahushua of Nazareth, son of Joseph. John 1:45

Yahushua proclaimed it himself, I am Yahushua of Nazareth, whom thou persecutest. Acts 22:8

He said that even after he rose that he would return to where? Galilee. I wonder why? But after I am risen again, I will go before you into Galilee Matt 26:32

And go quickly, and tell his disciples that he is risen from the dead; and, behold, he goeth before you into Galilee; there shall ye see him: lo, I have told you. Matt 28:7 see also Matt 28:10

And he preached in their synagogues throughout all Galilee, and cast out devils. Mark 1:39

Luke 2:44-51 is probably the best indicator of who Yahushua was –.

When Yahushua was 12 years old his parents took him to celebrate the feast in Jeru-Salem. When the feast was over Yahushua stayed in Jeru-Salem while his parents went back to Galilee. The parents traveled for a day to their home in Galilee and could not find Yahushua amongst their kinsfolk and acquaintances. When Yahushua was not found, his parents went back to Jeru-Salem and searched for him. They were afraid that he had died. Ultimately, Yahushua returned back to Nazareth with his parents because he was subject to them.

This beginning of miracles did Yahushua in Cana of Galilee, and manifested forth his glory; and his disciples believed on him. John 2:11

This [is] again the second miracle [that] Yahushua did , when he was come out of Judaea into Galilee, John 4:54

After these things Yahushua walked in Galilee: for he would not walk in *Jewry, because the Jews sought to kill him. John 7:1

What more needs to be said. He would not even walk among the Jews in Judea because they sought to kill him! * “Jewry Strong’s 2449 means Judaea.

Jn 4:8 The Samaritan woman at Jacob’s well, mistaking Yahushua for a Jew, asked:  How is it that thou being a Jew, ask drink of me, which am a woman of Samaria? For the Jews have no dealings with the Samaritans.”

Jn 4:12 “Art thou greater than our father Jacob, who gave us this well- – -.”

Jn 4:20 “ Our fathers worshiped in this mountain, and ye say that in Jerusalem is the place where men ought to worship.”

Jn 4:21 “Yahushua said unto her: Woman, believe Me the hour cometh when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father.”

Jn 4:22 “ You worship you know not who. We know whom we worship, for one has come to * rescue you from the Jews.” (Strongs’ #4991 “rescue,” “to be delivered from.”


1) The woman at the well was an Israelite. Jn 4:12

2) The Jews have no dealings with the Israelites. Jn 4:8

3) Israel worshiped in this mountain, (Gerazim). Jn 4:20

4) The Jews worshiped in Jebus-Jerusalem. Jn 4:20

5) Yahushua said, paraphrased: Woman, you are lost! You know not who you worship, and one has come to rescue /deliver you from the Jews.

6) The KJV corrupts this to say: “Salvation is of the Jews.” The Word of YHWH says: “Salvation is of YHWH.” Not the Jews!

7) Yahushua stayed three days in Samaria, teaching the lost Sheep of the House of Israel. Jn 4:40

It is not just symbolism that Yahushua’s father was named JOSEPH. That is what we have been trying to say all along. He descended from Joseph.


Some people are using the Book of Revelation verse 5:5 to justify the Judah error position. We need to remember first of all that the Book of Revelation in its entirety was written of things to come (Rev 1:1), and only references things of the past. Verse 5:5 has been examined and it is probably one of the most misunderstood verses in the entire Bible. We will examine it here but we know that others have differing interpretations.

Revelation 1:1 “The Revelation of Yahushua the Messiah, which YHWH gave unto Him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass;

“and He sent and signified [it] by his angel unto his servant John:”

This is the introductory and controlling passage from the

Book of Revelation.

“The Revelation of Yahushua . . .”

If the Lion of Rev 5:5 were Yahushua, then Yahushua would be giving the Revelation to Himself! Obviously that is not the case. Yahushua revealed His revelation to his servant John. (Rev 1:1)

Reviewing Revelation 5:5 which some adherents to the Judah position use is as follows. This verse with its Strong’s numbers taken from the KJV appears below.


2532 one 1520 of 1537 the elders 4245 saith 3004 unto me 3427, Weep 2799 not 3361: behold 2400 , the Lion 3023 of 5607 1537 the tribe 5443 of Juda2455, the Root 4491 of David 1138, hath prevailed 3528 to open 455 the book 975, and 2532 to loose 3089 the seven 2033 seals 4973 thereof 846.

Following is the verse in Greek. Notice the near complete sentence structure reversal in the English translation above! Also note the word “has” is not in the Greek text. Then note the sentence structure of other Greek verses are not so strangely reversed when translated into English.

κα? ε?ς ?κ τ?ν πρεσβυτέρων λέγει μοι? μ? κλα?ε,

And one of the elders said to me: do not weep;

?δο? ?νίκησεν ? λέων ? ?κ τ?ς φυλ?ς ?ούδα, ? ?ίζα Δαυίδ,

Behold! *Has prevailed the lion of the tribe of Judah, the root of David,

?νο?ξαι τ? βιβλίον κα? τ?ς ?πτ? σφραγ?δας α?το?.

to open the book and the seven seals of it.

The word “has” (above) is nowhere in the Greek text!. The same exact greek word interpreted: “prevailed,” (past tense) only twice in the NT writings, counting this occurrence, is correctly translated “Overcome” or “Conquer,” (future tense) in the other 21 times it occurs in the NT.

Thus we translate Rev 5:5:

Behold! Conquer the lion of the tribe of Judah, the root of David, to open the book and the seven seals of it.”

The knowledge of who king David of the tribe Judah is, and the discovery of his Moabite roots is the “Key” to the Book of Revelations!

This, the Prophets called: “The Keys of David.” Keys are used to lock and unlock, seal or open something up. In this case, casual access to understanding the revelations are prevented (sealed), until the Key (knowledge of who David is) is understood. Then its wallah! “Open Sesame!”

This verse refers to opening up a book or scroll and to the genetic roots of King David of the Jews. People have historically read fantasies into it.

Lets not be misled about a Greek translation in any event.

Revelations may reference past events, but they are primarily concerned with future events. However, when a specific reference is made to a past event, for example: “the Root of David,” the revelation has everything to do with the genealogy of the Jew’s King David! And the prerequisite to fully understanding the futuristic revelation, is to first know the “root” / genealogy of David. This essential knowledge is made the “key” to that which is to be revealed by revelation. Your bible is all about “genealogy.”

For example: Noah was perfect in all his generations, King David is NOT!

Yahushua is the one giving the revelations! Rev 1:1 If Yahushua is the lion of Rev 5:5, then He is giving the Revelation to Himself!

Lets first examine the word Lion, Strong’s 3023. This word Lion appears 104 times in the KJV. It appears 4 times in Revelation. Lion 3023 appears 9 times in the KJV, it means beast animal in every case. Maybe Rev 5:5 is telling us that the Lion is the mascot or enforcer of the tribe of Judas. Reviewing the word “Lion”. Generally there is no positive characteristic associated with this word. NEVER in the entire KJV is Lion associated with the Lamb of God, namely Jesus.

The word Lamb, Strong’s 721 occurs 26 times from Rev 5:8 to the end of the Book of Revelation. As the nursery rhyme goes –

MARY HAD A LITTLE LAMB, his father’s name was Joseph

Some verses tell us about Judah’s and Lion’s characters.

Judah 3063 [is] a lion’s 738 whelp 1482: from the prey 2964, my son 1121, thou art gone up 5927 : he stooped down 3766 , he couched 7257 as a lion738, and as an old lion 3833; who shall rouse him up 6965 ? Gen 49:9

Lion, Strong’s 738 is found 72 times in the KJV. It means a lion tearing apart. Whelp 1482 means a tribe. It is reasonable to state that Judah is like a lion tearing up its prey.

He lieth in wait 693 secretly 4565 as a lion 738 in his den 5520: he lieth in wait 693 to catch 2414 the poor 6041: he doth catch 2414 the poor 6041, when he draweth 4900 him into his net 7568. Psalm 10:9

Like 1825 as a lion 738 [that] is greedy 3700 of his prey 2963 , and as it were a young lion 3715 lurking 3427 in secret places 4565. Psalm 17:12

Lets examine the word Lamb 721. This word appears 107 times in the entire KJV and 27 times in the Book of Revelation. Most typically this word means mutton to eat. In Revelation it clearly means the Messiah. Nowhere in the entire Bible is there a verse with the words Judah and Lamb in it.

For I [will be] unto Ephraim 669 as a lion 7826, and as a young lion 3715 to the house 1004 of Judah 3063: I, [even] I, will tear 2963 and go away3212 ; I will take away 5375 , and none shall rescue 5337 [him]. Hosea 5:14

Revelation 12:4

Revelation 12:4 is also used to support the Judah error position.

“And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born.”

Obviously this passage refers to some event in the future. Have one third of the stars of heaven, whomever they may be, been cast to the earth? Declare if thou hast knowledge!


The evidence is overwhelming! What more needs to be said?

russell walker

scott vaught [email protected]