Created by pastorbuddy on 3/10/2009

blushing red

Adam was not the First Man

Pastor Bertrand L. Comparet

Many people have become agnostics because of the supposed conflict between the Bible and science. In truth, there is no conflict at all between a correct translation of the Bible and really proven science, not just unproven theories. One of these supposed conflicts is between the fact that science knows that human beings have lived on the earth far longer than the few thousand years covered by the Bible and the common belief that the Bible says that Adam was the first man. Yes, I know that most of the preachers say that, but the Bible doesn’t! It merely says that Adam was the first WHITE man. Let’s look at the record.

The many mistranslations in the King James versions obscure much of the truth. For example, Genesis 1:1-2, “In the beginning, God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form and void and darkness was upon the face of the deep.” In the Hebrew it says, “Now the earth had become chaotic and empty.”

(See Rotherham’s Emphasized Bible) That is, some early catastrophe had wrecked the earth, which was not “without form and void” before that. This was a judgment of God on earlier civilizations, for their wickedness. Jeremiah 4:23-27 gives a vision of it. “I beheld the earth and lo, it was without form and void; and the heavens and they had no light. I beheld the mountains and lo, they trembled and all the hills moved lightly. I beheld and lo, there was no man and all the birds of the heavens were fled. I beheld, and lo, the fruitful place was a wilderness and all the cities thereof were broken down at the presence of the Lord and by His fierce anger. For thus hath the Lord said, ‘The whole land shall be desolate; yet will I not make a full end.’” Therefore we do find buried ruins of cities older than Adam and skeletons which can be dated by the carbon 14 process as many as thousands of years older. But, the Bible itself tells us about this.

Next the Bible tells us about the creation of men, in the plural, in Genesis 1:26-28, saying, “Male and female created He THEM” (1:27), and God told these people, “Be fruitful and multiply and replenish the earth” (1:28). “Plenish” is an obsolete English word meaning “to fill”; and you cannot replenish what was never plenished, or filled, before. In the next chapter, Genesis 2 we find THE ADAM (in the singular) created. The Hebrew word, “aw-dawm” (rendered “Adam” in English) is from a root word meaning “to show blood in the face” or “of a ruddy complexion”, a word obviously not applicable to the dark races, which we also know from scientific evidence to be much older than the White Race.

Bible scholars know that Genesis 3:20 – “And Adam called his wife’s name ‘Eve’: because she was the mother of all living” – is a later interpolation, which was not in the earlier manuscripts. (See Moffatt’s translation.)

The Fourth chapter of Genesis records the birth of Cain and Abel; in the Hebrew, the wording suggests that they were twins. No other child of Eve is mentioned until the birth of Seth, when Adam was 130 years old, certainly long after the birth of Cain and Abel, which most scholars say was over 100 years earlier. Yet, when Cain killed Abel, and in punishment was driven out of the land, he complained to God that “any one that findeth me shall slay me.” Genesis 4:14. Upon being sent away, Cain found many other people, for Genesis 4:17 records that Cain not only married a wife, but built a city. You don’t build a city for just two people. These were the pre-Adamite races, mentioned in the latter part of Genesis 1.

The “Garden of Eden” was not a plantation of ordinary trees and shrubs. God did nothing so foolish as to make a special creation, just to have a man to wield shovel and pruning shears, when He already had millions of pre Adamites available for that type of work. We are told that the “Garden of Eden” contained “the tree of the knowledge (or experience) of good and evil”. No tree of the forest has any knowledge or experience of either good or evil. Ezekiel 31, says “Behold, the Assyrian was a cedar in Lebanon, with fair branches and a shadowing bough and of an high stature; Therefore his height was exalted above all the trees of the field and his boughs were multiplied and his branches became long; all the fowls of heaven made their nests in his boughs and under his branches did all the beasts of the field bring forth their young and under his shadow dwelt all great nations. THE CEDARS IN THE GARDEN OF GOD could not hide him: the fir trees were not like his boughs and the chestnut trees were not like his branches; NOR ANY TREE IN THE GARDEN OF GOD WAS LIKE UNTO HIM IN HIS BEAUTY. I have made him fair by the multitude of his branches: SO THAT ALL THE TREES OF EDEN THAT WERE IN THE GARDEN OF GOD ENVIED HIM”. Obviously, the trees in the Garden of God in Eden were “family trees” of races and nations who admired and envied the early Assyrian Empire. These made up the “garden” that Adam was to cultivate. That is, Satan had been what we might call the Super- intendant of this planet, to rule it in obedience to God’s will, until he forfeited that position by rebellion against God. Adam was sent to take his place. It was Adam’s job to rule the various nations and races of the earth as God’s representative here, educating them in God’s laws and enforcing obedience to those laws. These other races and nations had been here long before Adam.

Therefore the Bible makes it unmistakably clear that we are not all descended from Adam and Eve, for there were other races on earth, already old, already numerous, when Adam was created. Among these other races there are the several who are simply pre-Adamic and one at least, which is Satanic. If you will read the third chapter of Genesis, you will notice that, immediately after the fall of Adam, when God required them to answer what they had done, God condemned Satan. The word mistranslated “serpent” is the Hebrew word “naw-khash”, which literally means “enchanter” or “magician” and, no doubt Satan still possessing angelic powers, was able to be an enchanter or magician. It is certain that the one who seduced Eve was no mere scaly snake wriggling along on the ground. Yes, I said “seduced” Eve, for that is what she admitted in the original Hebrew. Cain was the son of that seduction. The Bible uses the word “begat” with monotonous regularity but, the first time the Bible ever says that Adam ever “begat” anyone is Genesis 5:3 where it says, “And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image: and called his name Seth. But to get back to Genesis 3:15, God said to Satan, “I will put enmity between thee and the woman and between THY SEED and HER SEED.” The same Hebrew word for “seed” is used in both cases. Satan was to have just as literal “seed”, or descendants as Eve. God’s own word being pledged to this, we must expect to find it actually happening and we do. Jesus Christ, Himself, tells us of it.

In Matthew 13:38-39, explaining the Parable of the Tares Among the Wheat, Jesus says, “The field is the world; the good seed are the children OF THE KINGDOM: but THE TARES ARE THE CHILDREN OF THE WICKED ONE: THE ENEMY THAT SOWED THEM IS THE DEVIL.” Again, in John 6:70-71, Jesus had been talking with His twelve deciples and we read: “Jesus answered them, ‘Have not I chosen you twelve and one of you is a devil?’ He spake of Judas Iscariot the son of Simon: for he it was that should betray Him being one of the twelve.” And again you should read carefully the eighth chapter of John, where Jesus told those who hated Him, “Ye are of your father the devil and the lusts of your father ye will do.” He was not being vulgarly abusive in either of these cases, for He never resorted to name calling so His statement was precisely accurate. He did call some of them “serpents, children of vipers” which again, was accurate. Long before this, they had adopted the serpent as a symbol of Satan. That is why their tradition had given the word naw-khash” the translation “serpent”, when it really means “enchanter”. Jesus therefore was telling them that they were of their father the devil (or serpent, if they preferred that word). In this He was simply stating a biological fact with scientific precision and identifying the persons of this ancestry.

Whenever someone tells you that the Bible is in conflict with what modern science has proved true, don’t you believe it. The things that many preachers teach are in conflict with scientific truth, as we all know, but these preachers are equally in conflict with the Bible. Go back to the Bible, not to any man made doctrines and double check it for accuracy of translation. You will find that what the Bible really says, in its original languages, is accurate with a precision our scientist have not yet achieved.
Admin note—-I found this in one of his “older sermons

The Bible tells of the creation of MEN, IN THE PLURAL, in Genesis 1:26-28, saying, “Male and female created He THEM” (1:27), and God told these people, “Be fruitful and multiply, and Replenish the earth” (1:28). “Plenish” is an obsolete English word, meaning “to fill”; and you cannot REplenish what was never plenished, or filled, before. In the next chapter, Genesis 2. we find THE ADAM (in the singular) formed. The Hebrew word, “aw-dawm” (rendered “Adam” in English) is from a root word meaning, “To show blood in the face” or “of a ruddy complexion” … a word obviously not applicable to the dark races, which we know from scientific evidence to be much older than the White Race.

Bible scholars know the latter part of the passage in Genesis 3:20… “and Adam called his wife’s name “Eve”; because she was the mother of all living” . . . -is a later interpolation, which was not in the earlier manuscripts (See Moffatt’s Translation). It follows that Eve (which means ‘life-giver’), being Adamic, could not have mothered the earlier Yellow or Black races; an idea which is only a popular misconception engendered by fallacious Christian Education.

EVE DID NOT EAT AN APPLE!

Edenic Covenant

In Gen. 3:3, God has told Eve she is not to eat (partake) of the fruit (offspring) of the tree that was in the midst of the Garden. We know that the tree in the midst of the Garden was a racial tree because it is described in Gen. 2:17 as a tree of the knowledge of good and evil. No fruit tree has a knowledge of good or evil, so it could not have been an “apple tree”. Also, Eve was admonished not to touch* the fruit of the tree on pain of death. Certainly, touching an apple would not have called for such stern punishment. Again in Gen. 3:61 Eve saw that the fruit was pleasant to the eyes (handsome) and capable of making one wise. As it turned out, partaking of the fruit of the racial tree did make Eve wise, because she knew (immediately after she and Adam had sinned) that she was naked. A fact that she did not seem to notice before the misdeed.

“to lay hands upon, to lie with” – See Strong’s Concordance.

When God asked Eve what she had done (Gen. 3:13) she said the serpent beguiled her. In the first place, the Hebrew word “Nachash”, translated “serpent,” actually means “spellbinding enchanter or magician”. Now we know how the serpent could talk to Eve. It was not a snake or any reptile with which we are familiar, but Satan, in one of his many appearances. Understanding the foregoing makes it easy to understand that the sin committed in the Garden of Eden was of a sexual nature because when Eve said she was beguiled she actually was saying she had been seduced. The Hebrew word “Nashall translated to “beguiled” actually means “to lead astray, to seduce”.

It is quite evident that before Adam and Eve sinned theirs was not a physical or sexual relationship. The Forgotten Books of Eden tell us that God, the Father, had desired to bring forth children of Light from both of them (perhaps in the same manner as Eve was brought from Adam). But when they committed sexual sin; they were reduced to a purely physical plane of reproduction (Gen. 3:16); they lost their aura or “glory” and were driven out of Eden. They were no longer children of light, free from toil and pain and death. Yet God’ s mercy did not depart from them. The fallen man and woman were restored by God’s grace to a condition of favour. They had been given mortality and they came therefore, under the dispensation of that state of being under which God made with them a second Covenant.

ADAMIC COVENANT

This Second Covenant teaches us the conditions of the life of mortal (fallen) humanity, the conditions, that is, that have governed the lives of all men since the Fall, under which, therefore we live. These conditions remain until the coming of the Christ when he restores all things created, to their original purity. This second Covenant was partly founded in a curse, for God’s judgment came upon Adam for his sin, and the judgment bore the burden of labour, “In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread”; the difficulty of labour, “thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee”; the sorrow of life, “in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life”; physical death, “dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return”. All these things, the fruit of the curse, are included in the judgment of God upon the Fall, yet how important it is to notice that even in such a Covenant, in such a statement of God’s will and purpose there is the clear promise of blessing and restoration. For you have, in the story of this second Covenant, the first promise of a Saviour, the first beginnings of God’s work of redemption through the Godly seed. It is this Covenant, made with Adam when cast out of Eden, which provides the first link in a chain that runs unbroken throughout the whole Bible; that chain of men, chosen and called out by God, who should labour for Him in righteousness, and who should be fellow workers with God to restore His dominion over the earth.